Page 28 - John Barber's Oakham Castle and its archaeology
P. 28

Fig. 34. The horseshoe over the doorway to the Magistrates’ Court
                                       belonged to a horse called ‘Clinker’ (see Rudkin 1905-06).

                                          At one time it was stolen from the Castle by an Oakham School boy and
                                       hidden under the floor of his study in School House. The boy who stole it would
                                       seem, without much doubt, to have been R N Jackson (at Oakham School 1845-
                                       47).  After  graduating  at  Sidney  Sussex  College,  Cambridge,  he  became  a
                                       Chaplain in the Royal Navy. From 1871-78 he was Vicar of Winchcombe in
                                       Gloucestershire. He was also godfather to Cecil Rhodes. Messing Rudkin in the
                                       Rutland  Magazine Vol  II  March  1906  tries to  give  us  a  clue  without  openly
                               30
            breaking confidence.  He writes: ‘Suffice it to say, that the one who took the shoe bore for a Christian name
            the surname of the other, and from my knowledge of the history of Leicestershire, I believe them both to have
            been descended from a very old Leicestershire family of NOBLE character, if not of lineage’. The two men
            referred to were: Robert Noble and Robert Noble Jackson. The shoe was stolen in 1846 and returned in 1858
            (the year that the great Dr Doncaster died and the year in which the old Hospital of Christ was pulled down and
            the new School House erected). When he left school he became a clergyman in the Church of England and had
            a parish down in the West Country. Eventually his conscience got the better of him and he returned the shoe,
            along with some doggerel verse to the Castle, where it has hung ever since.
                                                                      Thirdly,  a  good  deal  of  doubt  seems  to
                                                                   shroud  the  origin  of  what  has  now  become
                                                                   something  of  a  sentimental  and  picturesque
                                                                   custom.  To  my  mind  the  most  likely
                                                                   explanation is that the surrender of a horseshoe
                                                                   was  not  so  much  a  due  in  itself  as  a  pledge.
                                                                   Peers  of  the  realm,  who  had  occasion  to  visit
                                                                   Oakham, were probably accommodated by the
                                                                   Lord  of  the  Manor,  and  a  shoe  was  removed
                                                                   from  their  horse  or  horses  overnight  as  a
                                                                   guarantee of payment before they left, and then
                                                                   restored to the horse by way of a receipt, as it
                                                                   were. Throughout all my years in Oakham the
                                                                   vast majority of the horseshoes have been made
                                                                   by local farriers.

                                                                   Fig. 35. Part of the horseshoe collection
                                                                   in the Great Hall.

            Para 6: ‘FOUR CHAMBERS’
            These would undoubtedly have been located at the west end of the hall,
            i.e. at the end furthest removed from the kitchen and service quarters,
            which we know to have been on the east end, both by general usage and
            by my own excavations in this area (see Para 7). Mr Ralegh Radford
            writes about this part of the Castle: ‘Patching and fragmentary remains at
            the west end show that there was a two-storied solar block of the same
            width as the nave. It was entered by a door in the end of the north aisle
            and seems to have been flanked by a pent-roofed passage on this side’.
            This doorway is still visible, leading as it now does to two modern cells,
            whilst on the exterior of the west wall there are clear indications of the
            slope of the roof of this passage. It is just possible that there was a similar
                                                            31
            arrangement leading from the south aisle into the solar.

               Fig. 36. The doorway which JLB and others thought may have led to a former
                         solar, and which now leads to two relatively modern prison cells.


            30  See Rudkin 1905-06; for clarification, there were two schoolboy thieves, R N Jackson and his brother, but when Rudkin says ‘them both’, he is
            referring to R N Jackson and another cleric, Robert Noble, in the context of a much later visit to the Castle; it is JLB who emphasises ‘NOBLE’.
            31  Although JLB, C A R Radford and others believed that there was a two-storey solar block at the west end of the Great Hall, Nick Hill has recently
            shown that this is not likely to have been the case, postulating instead a substantial lean-to structure at each end as the original design (Hill 2013).

                                                            26
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33