Page 62 - John Barber's Oakham Castle and its archaeology
P. 62

41
               (a) Complete sharply pointed left sole,  with a narrow heel, slightly broken on right-hand side (Fig. 9.3). Length
                  9.3in, width across foot 2.7in, width across heel 1.4in.
               (b) Pointed right sole (child’s). Length 6.1in, width across foot 2.1in, width across heel 1.1in.
               (c) Square-ended left sole, torn on left-hand side (Fig. 9.4). Length 7.75in, width across foot 2.75in, width across
                  heel 1.5 in. A similar specimen was also found in an unstratified layer.
               (d) Fragmentary sole, maximum length 4.7in, maximum width 3.25in, thickness 0.4in. This interesting fragment is
                  composed of at least six pieces, which are held together by leather studs (Fig. 9.5). Apparently waste
                  fragments were saved to thicken the sole in this way.
               (e) Right rear upper of a boot (Fig. 9.6). At the top is a punched decoration arranged in three rows; firstly, the edge
                  is indented, below this is an irregular row of small star-shaped incisions, while at the bottom is a row of larger
                  trefoil-shaped holes. This specimen has been drawn from the inside to show the diagonal line of stitching
                  where a heel stiffener was attached.

               More leather fragments came from a layer of midden material at 8ft, just below a layer which yielded a number of
            tyg fragments. Aside from a large number of scraps, these consisted only of soles, of which two are illustrated (Figs.
            9.7 and 9.8). Both are  wide-toed and  well smoothed on the inside. The final piece of  note is a large  front upper
            brought up by the grab from about 12ft, a medieval level (Fig. 9.9). It has a pointed toe, and is badly torn on the right
            side. The leather is thick and supple. This specimen has six buckle holes between 1.5in and 2in from the inner edge.
            The main point of interest, however, lies in the method of fastening, which was by means of a simple strap and metal
            buckle. The latter is held in place by a strip of leather, the ends of which are threaded through each other on the
            underside of the specimen. Continual use of the strap has creased the centre of the leather.

            METAL OBJECTS

            A few objects were found at about 13ft in the moat, the most important being:
                                                                 42
               Fig. 10.1: Knife, surviving portion 7in long, stamped ‘W’ (?).
               Fig. 10.2: Knife, surviving portion 5in long, stamped  ‘L’ (?). The concave end suggests that this is a currier’s
                                                      43
                  knife, used for working leather after tanning.
               Knife (not illustrated), surviving portion  3½in
                  long (blade ¾in).

            A small  fragment of iron  was found attached to a
            sherd, from (2c) of the rampart.

            THE CLAY PIPES

            by A H Oswald MA, FSA, FMA

            As can be seen from the table below, the pipes all
            came  from  the  top  layers  of  the  rampart,  or  were
            found  unstratified  in  1953.  The  majority  of  them
                                            44
            conformed  to  the  well-known  types,   and  few
            required  detailed  comment.  As  a  whole,  the  pipes
            show  mainly  London  and  East  Anglian  influence,
            with probably only three ascribable to Bristol, and
            perhaps one to Broseley or the Potteries area.
                                           S
               Fig.  10.3:  Type  4a.  Marked  ‘ B C ’  on  base,
                  single-stroke  roulette  on  rim.  Duplicates:
                  British  Museum,  and  from  Bankside,
                  London (Guildhall Museum).
               Fig. 10.4: Same type. Marked ‘BC’ on its base,
                  different   dye,   but   similar   roulette.
                  Duplicates:  Bankside,  and  Belfast.  Similar
                  marks  at  Guildhall  Museum,  and  Hughes
                  Collection,  British  Museum.  Probably  a
                  London maker (not known).
               Fig.  10.5:  Same  type,  also  marked  ‘BC’,  but
                  different dye, and wedge-shaped roulette.
               Fig. 10.6: Type 4d. Similar Nottingham. Similar
                  embossed tree, Derby and Hanley. Identical,
                  Leicester.

                          Fig. 10. Metal Objects, Clay Pipes,
                             Stone, Flint, and Bone Objects.



                                                           60
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67